From the Globalist Perspective, America “Winning” is a Nonsensical Construct

What does it mean that a leading defense contractor, our main tech innovator, has all these H1B foreigners in roles at companies being provided with government subsidies and incentives and handling our technological innovation?

There is no standard of vetting for these workers that is acceptable. There should be zero foreign workers in these positions dealing with government or defense. If that puts us at a temporary economic or natsec disadvantage then our military and governmental leadership have fucked up beyond repair and should be removed immediately. If our country can be destroyed by the absence of a few thousand top-level tech students and that is allowed to happen, then it should be assumed our country has already been overthrown.

And, of course, it has been. By globalism itself.

Why would anyone accept the pro-globalist argument in any form, especially the appeals to competition and America “winning”?

Globalism means there is effectively no “America.” America winning in a globalist world means that projects and numbers are assigned to “America” and nice things are said about “America.” It’s meaningless. It’s the Knicks winning against the Lakers from the perspective of the NBA.

Why would we listen to globalists as they tell us what they must be allowed to do on our behalf, so we can feel as though we “won”?

They never cared about competition for America’s benefit before. If they did, we’d already have top-level American tech students and workers. They cared about globalizing America. Their priorities have not changed at all.