Steely Resolve

The day was darkened as reports rolled in describing the assassination of Charlie Kirk. I pray for his soul, his family, and all the victims of the latest Trauma Event, all of us. The Nation’s turmoil is ongoing. The physical tragedy, this time, was for one man to bear and he deserved far better than to be gunned down in an act of state-level terrorism.

Steve Bannon, in his response following the announcement of his friend and ally’s death, said the moment calls for “steely resolve.” He referred to Kirk as a “casualty of war.” It is critical to keep this in mind in our attempts to contextualize and respond to the latest mass Trauma Event. The war did not just begin, it has always been occurring. We must understand who we are at war with and accept that we are already on the battlefield.

It is entirely possible, logical, and likely that real physical trauma is part of a given psychological operation, though it is not required. The presence of physical trauma does not refute the presence of a psyop, it only illustrates the intensity of the psyop and provides some insight into the true evil behind it. When a real-world event is staged as part of a psychological operation it’s called a psyact. The act is being carried out deliberately to elicit a psychological reaction in the audience.

To explain our choice to ignore the presence of the psyop aspect as a function of feigned respect for the physical tragedy fails in its attempt to respect what has happened. At the same time, it not only fails to resolve the issue, it fails to defend the target of Trauma Events, our minds. When we choose to rage-type our emotions into the void online and bicker about the details of a partially fictionalized event, the enemy wins. In fact, this is why the enemy wins. This response illustrates the extent of our brainwashing. We are conditioned to base our actions on the expected social response we wish to receive. Social considerations are incompatible with any effort toward thwarting future Trauma Events. Nothing will be solved by figuring out where a patsy went to high school or examining his parents’ silverware.

If we want to win, we cannot continue responding to the enemy’s chaos and wickedness by doing exactly what the enemy wants us to do every single time. It is possible to respect the tragedy and its victims while understanding that we are witnessing a mass psychological and emotional attack on our friends, our loved ones, and ourselves—everybody—by the enemy, specifically to elicit the desired response.

The fact that the emotional response is normal and righteous relative to the tragedy does not justify the response. Unless, of course, we are meant to forget about the psyop aspect and only retain the trauma. As the target of psychological warfare, the defense cannot be self-righteousness over the emotions we experience after witnessing Trauma Events broadcast in mass media. We are doing the enemy’s work for them.

Figuring out the truth by gathering the minute details of a staged event, investigating online, forming theories, and then spending the next twenty years brow-beating everyone we know is not a strategy that threatens the enemy. It is exactly what the enemy wants. How many collective man-hours of internet sleuthing will we burn without reaching a single conclusion on anything? Then, because we are desperate for some explanation, we defer as our default to whatever the State says in its secret hidden documents.

Millions of hours? Billions? Trillions? The list of unsolved mysteries is as long as the list of Trauma Events. At some point we have to consider why that might be.

The psyact: a public tragedy was staged and a media campaign was orchestrated to follow it. Once we understand that the scene is choreographed to any extent whatsoever, we should admit that we are almost entirely unable to determine which details are part of the choreography and which are naturally occurring. The Trauma Event is a crime with no chance of being properly solved because a non-reality is being layered onto a reality, obliterating the possibility of any truthful resolution. The abstract (psychological response) is projected onto the real so that the reality becomes the abstraction insofar as anyone interacts with it. This means the “evidence trail” does not lead to some white, liberal, Muslim, trantifa character, the perfect patsy, who left his gun in the woods. It leads to global intelligence, gangs, cartels etc… at minimum.

(By “evidence trail” we unfortunately mean information supplied at some point from an unknown source on the internet that we believe fits with other information, enhancing the reality of the abstraction, exactly as the enemy wants.)

The tragedy continues perpetuating itself for as long as the public is traumatized about the event. In this state, we should expect to be exploited at will, as the enemy has completed its task, making us easily controllable and self-defeating. The shape of the tragedy changes as the narrative evolves every time new information is incorporated. That, too, is a function of the psyop aspect of the psyact and how it is communicated through mass media, amplified by algorithms and trusted voices.

Today, we watched the 23rd annual memorialization of the 9/11 mass Trauma Event—another mass Trauma Event that remains unsolved and unresolved. The government still hides what we assume are the answers and will not give them to us. This can only be because it is not actually our government in any relevant way. But after 24 years, an “official” investigation that happened to control all information regarding the event that served as a limited hangout, still serves as the Official Story of 9/11 while we wait for the State to admit its involvement by releasing documents no more trustworthy than the passports of the hijackers.

Which mass Trauma Event has been successfully solved by internet sleuths, then spread to the masses? Is there a Trauma Event that has been fully resolved, even one? If there is not a single event that has been solved and resolved, perhaps it is time that our approach is adjusted.

If we know we are targeted with intense psychological warfare at all times, we must be responsive to the psyop aspect at all times. It cannot be ignored for the sake of our emotional need to contextualize the physical tragedy. That would be a choice to give the enemy free reign to continue staging Trauma Events. It allows the enemy and its media operation to get everyone back on the same page, seeking out breathless, round-the-clock coverage of the Trauma Event on Fox News and Twitter.

Parsing the details of events designed and staged for cameras and media in order to inflict mass terror on the public is choosing to respond to the physical aspects of the tragedy while ignoring the psyop aspect. The rationale for this approach is always that if only we could solve the physical aspect of the tragedy, then the psyop would be revealed, the world would accept the explanation, and we would prevent intentionally staged Trauma Events from happening again. This has, to my knowledge, never worked along any timeline that allows for a proper response to a Trauma Event, certainly never within a timeframe that slows the advancement of those staging Trauma Events.

We do not need to parse any details to know that what we are witnessing is being carried out as part of a psychological mass Trauma Event. We do not need to spend years reaching this point, particularly not when another mass Trauma Event is soon to follow. The most recent Trauma Event came only a day before the memorialization of one of the biggest and most traumatic. We can mourn the casualties of hybrid warfare and pray for the victims and affected parties. To do it in lieu and at the expense of understanding the real purpose of the Trauma Event is to abdicate our role in deending against hybrid warfare. We must have the conversational space and the wherewithal to understand the psyact for what it is. This necessitates asking difficult questions and being prepared to receive uncomfortable answers.

The strategy we have employed in approaching Trauma Events is not even rational. Our response is itself a product of our conditioning, having been left undefended from unrelenting Trauma Events throughout our lives. It is, therefore, exactly the response intended by the enemy when planning the Trauma Event.

The truth is perpetually unavailable as a function of the psyop aspect of the psyact as well as a function of our worldly reality. There is no reason to believe the “truth” would be accepted by anyone who has already succumbed to the psyop. This approach results in succumbing to the psyop. To stop future Trauma Events, the enemy’s tactic must be made to stop working.

That can only be accomplished by refusing to respond to Trauma Events in the way we are conditioned to respond. We must adamantly abstain from committing ourselves to this or that fact or theory and disbelieve everything from authority as a default. The tidbits of mediated information we receive is only information among other information, of unknown validity and often unknown provenance. We must avoid emotional responses. We must avoid using emotional displays as group posturing. Hypotheticals should be encouraged not prevented from even being discussed or considered.

We cannot do the enemy’s work for the enemy and expect to survive, much less succeed.

It does not matter that our anger is righteous, the enemy wants us in anger.

It does not matter than our fears are justified, the enemy wants us in fear.

If we wish to defeat the enemy, giving them exactly what they want at every turn is an odd and futile way to go about it. May God bless America.