15 Comments
Feb 21Liked by Chris Paul

National Endowment for Democracy. Sounds as comfy as the National Endowment for the Arts. Who would be against a wholesome organization like that? They obviously are defending Democracy around the world, right? A private org. funded by the government.

Democracy awards? Some speakers have included No Name, RINO Ryan and Pelosi?? Wait, what? Those three are deep state enemies of America. ( well, one is no longer )

I'm so damn tired of hearing this term "democracy" bandied about by Dems and HRC, saying this or that is a "threat to OUR Democracy". Yes yours, not ours.

More evidence that our entire government bureaucracy is run by the CIA, the enemy of freedom worldwide.

Yep, I felt the need to comment even though I have a lot to still listen to, lol.

Expand full comment

Thanks for putting all this Navalny information together.

We the People are the news now and your sharing the Truth helps us all... it also makes the DS Rat Bastard's narratives look even more ridiculous :-)

God Wins!

God Bless!!!

Expand full comment

The so-called National Endowment for Democracy demands that Russia release all their "unjustly detained" political prisoners? That is RICH. Let me hazard a guess that they have said nothing at all about releasing OUR unjustly imprisoned J6 prisoners. And we have been paying for this actual fascism? I'd be shocked, but governmental (and NGO) corruption doesn't surprise me at all any more. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment

I wish everyone could hear this. I do my part and share, but people have to WANT to know and thus listen. Thank ,you, Chris, so very, very much!!! You work so hard for all of us. I can't imagine the preparation you have to go through for these marathon episodes!!!

Expand full comment
founding

I don’t know why, but I didn’t receive yesterday’s podcast. I just sent a delivery check to my email address and it worked.. Did everyone else get yesterday’s podcast? How can I be expected to get through the day without my fiery but mostly peaceful podcast???

Expand full comment

It took me a bit to finish this Navalny series, I even detoured mid-way and watched the Documentary Navalny hoping to expand a better understanding of the back story. It was worth every minute, excellent thread Chris.

Expand full comment

Thanks for eye opening real investigative reporting.

You have been so helpful in showing so many of us the sleuthing of the narrative.

Expand full comment

The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy."

The 2020 election and COVID-19 were the two most censored events in American history.

Mike Benz outlines how the government established a permanent domestic censorship office under the pretext of countering misinformation. and disinformation.

Initially considered for the State Department, CIA, and FBI, the censorship office found its home in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), utilizing the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

DHS classified elections as critical infrastructure and online misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation as cybersecurity attacks.

The original goal of countering Russian disinformation shifted to suppressing domestic dissent and the populist movement led by President Trump.

Examining the 2020 election's censorship strategy, Benz details CISA's collaboration with Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphika, and the Atlantic Council through the Election Integrity Partnership.

The censorship consortium employed coercive tactics, leveraging its deputized status to pressure tech companies through government threats.

A critical element was the seven-month pre-censorship campaign before the 2020 election. The consortium compelled social media companies to introduce a new "delegitimization" violation, targeting content challenging faith in mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot drop boxes.

The overarching goal was narrative control, preventing doubts about a Biden victory and avoiding a crisis akin to the 2000 Bush-Gore election.

Anticipating Biden's victory hinging on mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot dropboxes, the consortium precensored any questioning of the election's legitimacy, particularly if Trump appeared to win on election night but later lost due to late-arriving mail-in ballots.

https://t.me/MikeBenzCyber

Expand full comment
founding

The last one I received was Wednesday.

Expand full comment

Holy sh,,,,eep dip I am going to start the marathon podcast.

Expand full comment
founding

Hahaha

Expand full comment

War in OUTER SPAAAACE!!!

Expand full comment

Sounds like the movie Geostorm?

😆 🤣

Expand full comment

Search for "Russian pilot assassinated in Spain". Interesting...

Expand full comment

I cannot even understand the pResident.

Expand full comment