What should be required for every law is an "Objective(s)" section right after the title of the law/bill, which explains exactly for what each law is intended -- a "Spirit of the Law" section right before the actual text. That way, 1-2-5-10-50-100 years later we do not have judges playing stupid making some of these decisions. Take that option completely away from them.
Thanks so much for tackling the David Zweig “Trump White House” smear! I saw no one else mentioning it, and it bugged me that Zweig’s rather obvious insinuation—that Trump also might’ve been censoring Americans via Twitter—was going unchallenged even on Truth Social. You identified exactly what Zweig was doing, creating a “false equivalency,” a version of the “what-about-ism” Leftists use to shift blame onto their adversaries. It’s particularly nasty to criticize Trump for Deep State sabotage of his presidency, all while our captured government made us unwittingly fund our own censorship. Thanks for calling this out!
"Can Con" sucks. Obviously I'm biased but dear lord....I've tried watching his and Patel Patriot/Jon's morning show so many times and always turn it off within the first 10 minutes because of his general demeaner (did you know FL is the best state that ever existed on this planet and you're just stupid if you don't live there?!).
Florida is not the best place to live in it’s over populated I lived there for 20 years too hot during summer too cold during winter and there beaches are piss water.
I know! It totally felt like Monday came too soon. Yes, you said Tuesday. No harm done; it made me focus better. I have ADHD, and therefore a terrible relationship with time.
Great work as always. Chris, we’re you always this outspoken and direct? I’ve met people who were quiet as kids and then became talkative... Hopefully your siblings had “thick skin”! 😎
Twitter files gives me a headache. Chris I know Elon bought Twitter but who is running Twitter Elon or The FBI? It has been on my mind quite some time just curious and wanted to know. Great discussion today in my opinion Keri Lake has a good chance of winning by taking her case to the Supreme Court hopefully 🤞 she’ll get a woman judge this second time around I strongly believe that the judge was paid off to dismiss her case before actually looking at the evidence right in-front of him before making his ruling such a shame. Thank you Chris for another fantastic episode as always keep up the good work you’re amazing in everything you do 👏
My intention wasn’t meant I don’t like male judges I have nothing against them but sometimes I think it’s better for a female judge to see in a woman’s point of view of the situation and get down to the point and see all the evidence do you see where im getting at? Because the other judge didn’t bother to look all the evidence and dismissed the case.
No, I guess I’m missing your point. I didn’t assume that you didn’t like male judges. I just don’t understand the reasoning here. How does the sex of the judge make any difference? Both candidates are women, by the way. (I too am a woman, which I also think is irrelevant here.) This issue is about an election that admittedly violated state law, and whether and how it should be remedied. I can’t see how it has anything to do with the sex of anyone in the situation or in the courtroom.
I don’t know how to explain it to you so you can understand my point of view some judges are tough on women in general I know both candidates are women that’s not the point I’m trying to get across what I’m trying to say is maybe it’s better for Keri to have a female judge to hear her side of the truth and the evidence that it was indeed a stolen election because the other male judge didn’t bother to read or look at the evidence  that was placed in front of him hopefully the supreme court judge who ever maybe goes into Keri’s favor.
What should be required for every law is an "Objective(s)" section right after the title of the law/bill, which explains exactly for what each law is intended -- a "Spirit of the Law" section right before the actual text. That way, 1-2-5-10-50-100 years later we do not have judges playing stupid making some of these decisions. Take that option completely away from them.
Thanks so much for tackling the David Zweig “Trump White House” smear! I saw no one else mentioning it, and it bugged me that Zweig’s rather obvious insinuation—that Trump also might’ve been censoring Americans via Twitter—was going unchallenged even on Truth Social. You identified exactly what Zweig was doing, creating a “false equivalency,” a version of the “what-about-ism” Leftists use to shift blame onto their adversaries. It’s particularly nasty to criticize Trump for Deep State sabotage of his presidency, all while our captured government made us unwittingly fund our own censorship. Thanks for calling this out!
Great show, so glad to have you back. The middle portion regarding the border trafficking was excellent. Keep going :-)
"Can Con" sucks. Obviously I'm biased but dear lord....I've tried watching his and Patel Patriot/Jon's morning show so many times and always turn it off within the first 10 minutes because of his general demeaner (did you know FL is the best state that ever existed on this planet and you're just stupid if you don't live there?!).
I think your referencing how head and shoulders above most in the scene CP is. His work and philosophical ethics are meritious indeed.
Florida is not the best place to live in it’s over populated I lived there for 20 years too hot during summer too cold during winter and there beaches are piss water.
Wait—isn’t it Wednesday?
What did I say?! Did I say Tuesday? I could imagine myself saying it since yesterday felt like Monday even though it was Tuesday
I know! It totally felt like Monday came too soon. Yes, you said Tuesday. No harm done; it made me focus better. I have ADHD, and therefore a terrible relationship with time.
Thanks again CP... 6 shows in 2 days? Dude, now you know why I’ve dubbed you THWMISB... 🐸🇺🇸👍🏻
The two weeks prior to last I’d done 11 shows and 10 shows. It’s maybe a little too much haha
Hey, Chris, hope you had a Merry Christmas and enjoyed your much-deserved time off.
Great work as always. Chris, we’re you always this outspoken and direct? I’ve met people who were quiet as kids and then became talkative... Hopefully your siblings had “thick skin”! 😎
Twitter files gives me a headache. Chris I know Elon bought Twitter but who is running Twitter Elon or The FBI? It has been on my mind quite some time just curious and wanted to know. Great discussion today in my opinion Keri Lake has a good chance of winning by taking her case to the Supreme Court hopefully 🤞 she’ll get a woman judge this second time around I strongly believe that the judge was paid off to dismiss her case before actually looking at the evidence right in-front of him before making his ruling such a shame. Thank you Chris for another fantastic episode as always keep up the good work you’re amazing in everything you do 👏
Why would a female judge make a difference? I just hope she gets a fair, uncompromised judge!
My intention wasn’t meant I don’t like male judges I have nothing against them but sometimes I think it’s better for a female judge to see in a woman’s point of view of the situation and get down to the point and see all the evidence do you see where im getting at? Because the other judge didn’t bother to look all the evidence and dismissed the case.
No, I guess I’m missing your point. I didn’t assume that you didn’t like male judges. I just don’t understand the reasoning here. How does the sex of the judge make any difference? Both candidates are women, by the way. (I too am a woman, which I also think is irrelevant here.) This issue is about an election that admittedly violated state law, and whether and how it should be remedied. I can’t see how it has anything to do with the sex of anyone in the situation or in the courtroom.
I don’t know how to explain it to you so you can understand my point of view some judges are tough on women in general I know both candidates are women that’s not the point I’m trying to get across what I’m trying to say is maybe it’s better for Keri to have a female judge to hear her side of the truth and the evidence that it was indeed a stolen election because the other male judge didn’t bother to read or look at the evidence  that was placed in front of him hopefully the supreme court judge who ever maybe goes into Keri’s favor.