Another fine show young man... I wonder if those idiots actually read Q-posts, or do they just say a bunch of shit, and never give ANY examples of what they’re talking about??? Thanks again... 🐸🇺🇸🤨
I'm not sure, but you may be missing a key point about why so-called child-brains adhere so strongly to a certain set of facts.
Maybe you have already noticed this, I just haven't heard you mention it here. The best form of persuasion is to present someone with facts in a way that they form their own conclusion, rather than being told directly.
In your story, you mention a bunch of facts to this person as foregone conclusions (biolabs, etc.) Had she just been told another narrative to compare to, she may have less fervently clung to it. However, since the media presents only certain facts, on some emotional level she gets invested (and therefore convinced, new information be damned) that she really put the correct narrative together.
In industry this gets used all the time. Often I don't present a best idea to management. I present facts as I see them, try to be unbiased, but often the best solution pops out by the metrics I use to compare them. That way I don't get what I want, the decision maker gets what he's convinced he wants.
Anyway, just my 2 cents. I'm trying to work out how to present facts to child-brains in a way that they can piece it together for themselves, and on political matters I'm not very good at it. The media / CIA have worked it out to a science. As the saying goes "it is easier to deceive a man than to convince him he's been deceived."
I’m not trying to convince them and I’m not trying to manipulate them. I’m not concerned with the result. The result I aim for is “this person heard true things from someone who is happy to back it up.”
They then have the options of thinking I’m stupid, crazy, or genuinely serious. They usually know I'm not stupid or crazy, so they understand I’m being serious and I'm happy to defend it.
It’s not worth my time, or anyone’s, to act as if the existence of biolabs is in doubt. When you aren’t trying to change people’s minds, you can focus on other things. Their minds will change naturally from the understanding that it’s not just conspiracy theories from crazy people.
Yeah, those are all good points. You're definitely more direct about ripping the band-aid off, which I commend.
Depending on the level of child brain I'm talking to, I may take a more indirect approach like "Do you think our involvement in Ukraine has anything to do with the biolabs we funded, like the Wuhan lab?" and when they are obviously clueless, I drop it and walk away in disgust.
Like you point out, I have to gauge the amount of time I waste depending on how far gone they are.
I use the same approach with everyone. I don’t care if people are convinced. They usually won’t be no matter what you do. I want to have an interaction that will linger with them and frustrate them.
Wow. That last article was chock-FULL of dumbass! To think that dolts get PAID thousands of dollars to do “research,” and all they produce is total bullshit! What’s worse is that the brain-washed mAsses BUY into it!
Another fine show young man... I wonder if those idiots actually read Q-posts, or do they just say a bunch of shit, and never give ANY examples of what they’re talking about??? Thanks again... 🐸🇺🇸🤨
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/stacey-plaskett-sex-tape-225951
It's quite a story
I misread you earlier and thought you meant on the J6 committee. I remember Plaskett well.
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/312/503/eb9.jpg
Lmao
I was wondering about the Virgin Islands thing when I first heard it.
So glad you covered this. Great show as always. 🙏
I'm not sure, but you may be missing a key point about why so-called child-brains adhere so strongly to a certain set of facts.
Maybe you have already noticed this, I just haven't heard you mention it here. The best form of persuasion is to present someone with facts in a way that they form their own conclusion, rather than being told directly.
In your story, you mention a bunch of facts to this person as foregone conclusions (biolabs, etc.) Had she just been told another narrative to compare to, she may have less fervently clung to it. However, since the media presents only certain facts, on some emotional level she gets invested (and therefore convinced, new information be damned) that she really put the correct narrative together.
In industry this gets used all the time. Often I don't present a best idea to management. I present facts as I see them, try to be unbiased, but often the best solution pops out by the metrics I use to compare them. That way I don't get what I want, the decision maker gets what he's convinced he wants.
Anyway, just my 2 cents. I'm trying to work out how to present facts to child-brains in a way that they can piece it together for themselves, and on political matters I'm not very good at it. The media / CIA have worked it out to a science. As the saying goes "it is easier to deceive a man than to convince him he's been deceived."
I’m not trying to convince them and I’m not trying to manipulate them. I’m not concerned with the result. The result I aim for is “this person heard true things from someone who is happy to back it up.”
They then have the options of thinking I’m stupid, crazy, or genuinely serious. They usually know I'm not stupid or crazy, so they understand I’m being serious and I'm happy to defend it.
It’s not worth my time, or anyone’s, to act as if the existence of biolabs is in doubt. When you aren’t trying to change people’s minds, you can focus on other things. Their minds will change naturally from the understanding that it’s not just conspiracy theories from crazy people.
Yeah, those are all good points. You're definitely more direct about ripping the band-aid off, which I commend.
Depending on the level of child brain I'm talking to, I may take a more indirect approach like "Do you think our involvement in Ukraine has anything to do with the biolabs we funded, like the Wuhan lab?" and when they are obviously clueless, I drop it and walk away in disgust.
Like you point out, I have to gauge the amount of time I waste depending on how far gone they are.
I use the same approach with everyone. I don’t care if people are convinced. They usually won’t be no matter what you do. I want to have an interaction that will linger with them and frustrate them.
Yeah, ultimately that's the important part - get them to rethink their false reality, something they can't get away from.
Wow, great insight!
Thank you Chris for another smashing episode 👏
Haven’t listened to the whole show yet Chris but the further we go the more I think we’re watching a movie. Check this out https://truthsocial.com/users/qalerts/statuses/109599454309064627
Haha yep...Hyper Flamboyant? Lol
Wow. That last article was chock-FULL of dumbass! To think that dolts get PAID thousands of dollars to do “research,” and all they produce is total bullshit! What’s worse is that the brain-washed mAsses BUY into it!
A female Representative from the US Virgin Islands was a big part of the J6 impeachment against President Trump.
I like it. Will keep it in mind. 👍🏻